07-08-2025, 07:43 AM (This post was last modified: 07-08-2025, 08:15 AM by FCD.)
Myke - Here's what I think is going on there...
Arrest one of these guys, and he 'sings' about five more.
Arrest all six, and they 'sing' about thirty others.
I believe there was a tremendous amount of thought put into how the list was constructed so that it be very difficult to de-construct 'some' of the list, without exposing 'all' of the list. This, once again, is by design. Yes, there are probably some low level guy's names on the list who got there just as a matter of circumstance or association. Those guys aren't the point of the main names on the list, they're just sort of what I would characterize as "Bycatch" in the overall operation. In order to catch the big fish, the ones who really know some stuff, you also wind up catching some 'bycatch' of fish swimming around in the same thermocline and vicinity. A lot of this 'bycatch' is probably symbiotic species who need these other 'fish' for either protection or food. Hangers on, so to speak.
I think, the way the list gets presented by the MSM (and others), gives people the mental impression that everyone on the list is someone who is just some low-life horndog who runs around 24x7 with their johnson hanging out, and I don't believe that is the case. Nor, do I believe that the people who came up with the notion to create such a list were your run of the mill Beltway Bandit "dummies". I could easily believe someone as high as the top guy in the CIA (DCIA) coming up with the original idea for a list like this. Heck, they probably also thought very carefully during the candidate selection for the Epstein role. There's just way too much going on there, and I honestly don't believe this can be left up to coincidence, to little ol' "Jeffy" just keeping a list so he wouldn't forget people's names. This thing goes DEEP! Very DEEP!
I mean just think about it; this list has had no less than (3) presidents who are in charge of the most powerful nation in the free world (and all their subordinates) dancing like puppets on a string over the "list". That don't happen without a pretty high-level and well thought out plan. You can just imagine what someone must have contemplated in all of this. Yes, establishing the need for the list to begin with was probably one of the easier steps. Beyond this, organizers had to figure out a way to ensure the list itself would never be exposed, and only individuals, hand-picked (along with evidence) for a specific purpose, would be exposed.
(07-08-2025, 07:43 AM)FCD Wrote: Myke - Here's what I think is going on there...
Arrest one of these guys, and he 'sings' about five more.
Arrest all six, and they 'sing' about thirty others.
I believe there was a tremendous amount of thought put into how the list was constructed so that it be very difficult to de-construct 'some' of the list, without exposing 'all' of the list. This, once again, is by design. Yes, there are probably some low level guy's names on the list who got there just as a matter of circumstance or association. Those guys aren't the point of the main names on the list, they're just sort of what I would characterize as "Bycatch" in the overall operation. In order to catch the big fish, the ones who really know some stuff, you also wind up catching some 'bycatch' of fish swimming around in the same thermocline and vicinity. A lot of this 'bycatch' is probably symbiotic species who need these other 'fish' for either protection or food. Hangers on, so to speak.
I think, the way the list gets presented by the MSM (and others), gives people the mental impression that everyone on the list is someone who is just some low-life horndog who runs around 24x7 with their johnson hanging out, and I don't believe that is the case. Nor, do I believe that the people who came up with the notion to create such a list were your run of the mill Beltway Bandit "dummies". I could easily believe someone as high as the top guy in the CIA (DCIA) coming up with the original idea for a list like this. Heck, they probably also thought very carefully during the candidate selection for the Epstein role. There's just way too much going on there, and I honestly don't believe this can be left up to coincidence, to little ol' "Jeffy" just keeping a list so he wouldn't forget people's names. This thing goes DEEP! Very DEEP!
I mean just think about it; this list has had no less than (3) people who are in charge of the most powerful nation in the free world (and all their subordinates) dancing like puppets on a string over the "list". That don't happen without a pretty high-level and well thought out plan. You can just imagine what someone must have contemplated in all of this. Yes, establishing the need for the list to begin with was probably one of the easier steps. Beyond this, organizers had to figure out a way to ensure the list itself would never be exposed, and only individuals, hand-picked (along with evidence) for a specific purpose, would be exposed.
(07-08-2025, 08:01 AM)MykeNukem Wrote: Sort of the like the banks?
Too big to fail ..
I hear ya.
Exactly! Let one of them fail, and they'll start blabbing about what's really going on behind the scenes with Wall St. and the Fed! "Can't have that (at all), so we need to come up with a mantra we can sucker people in with. Okay, I've got it..."Too Big to Fail"...that'll be the new party line!"
If people really understood the relationship between 'derivatives' on Wall St. and the impacts on the entire nations banking system, they would be floored! Just floored!! The whole 2008 crisis and the "Sub-Prime" markets can be explained in less than 60 seconds with only a discussion about derivatives and nothing more. When people worry about 'Insider Trading' they immediately think of some guy or firm making huge profits in the middle of the night, and while this happens it's just a drop of water in the ocean in comparison to insider trading in the form of off-loading toxic debt in the form of derivatives (in the middle of the night).
(07-08-2025, 07:43 AM)FCD Wrote: Myke - Here's what I think is going on there...
Arrest one of these guys, and he 'sings' about five more.
Arrest all six, and they 'sing' about thirty others.
I believe there was a tremendous amount of thought put into how the list was constructed so that it be very difficult to de-construct 'some' of the list, without exposing 'all' of the list. This, once again, is by design. Yes, there are probably some low level guy's names on the list who got there just as a matter of circumstance or association. Those guys aren't the point of the main names on the list, they're just sort of what I would characterize as "Bycatch" in the overall operation. In order to catch the big fish, the ones who really know some stuff, you also wind up catching some 'bycatch' of fish swimming around in the same thermocline and vicinity. A lot of this 'bycatch' is probably symbiotic species who need these other 'fish' for either protection or food. Hangers on, so to speak.
I think, the way the list gets presented by the MSM (and others), gives people the mental impression that everyone on the list is someone who is just some low-life horndog who runs around 24x7 with their johnson hanging out, and I don't believe that is the case. Nor, do I believe that the people who came up with the notion to create such a list were your run of the mill Beltway Bandit "dummies". I could easily believe someone as high as the top guy in the CIA (DCIA) coming up with the original idea for a list like this. Heck, they probably also thought very carefully during the candidate selection for the Epstein role. There's just way too much going on there, and I honestly don't believe this can be left up to coincidence, to little ol' "Jeffy" just keeping a list so he wouldn't forget people's names. This thing goes DEEP! Very DEEP!
I mean just think about it; this list has had no less than (3) presidents who are in charge of the most powerful nation in the free world (and all their subordinates) dancing like puppets on a string over the "list". That don't happen without a pretty high-level and well thought out plan. You can just imagine what someone must have contemplated in all of this. Yes, establishing the need for the list to begin with was probably one of the easier steps. Beyond this, organizers had to figure out a way to ensure the list itself would never be exposed, and only individuals, hand-picked (along with evidence) for a specific purpose, would be exposed.
![[Image: qa.png]](https://cypherage.com/images/ficons/qa.png)
![[Image: https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.ama...x1057.jpeg]](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!BA6H!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F55bd1fde-d5a8-4a93-b3de-666c05aeebf5_749x1057.jpeg)
![[Image: eb698aa13fec71180e75818fcf962b80.jpeg?width=568]](https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/eb/69/8a/eb698aa13fec71180e75818fcf962b80.jpeg?width=568)
